Skip to content
Tech Vs Humans
  • Mission
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • The Music List
  • The Reading List
  • Search Icon

Tech Vs Humans

A Digital Transformation Playspace

Measure at Great Cost

Measure at Great Cost

November 3, 2022

Apple is notorious for being a “measure twice, cut once” kind of company. It works for them.

On the other hand, Google is more “launch and iterate” in their approach, which works for them.

When you implement Subscription-based software, you have a choice about which approach works for you. Therefore, it’s worth a moment to think about which style best represents your organization.

You can implement the software as Apple would. You can do a comprehensive discovery, modify, test, modify, and release.

Or you can implement it like Google. You can do enough discovery, test, and release. And then do it all over again.

There are reasons for either approach and some constraints.

When it comes to the quickest time to receive value for your Subscription-based software, it’s hard to find fault with Google’s approach.

When it comes to Apple’s historically strong quality-centric delivery, it’s hard to argue against the “measure twice, cut once” approach. This scenario works well for product releases or even some custom code creation projects.

However, when you buy a Subscription software, your default state should be: I want value now because I’m paying for the subscription now. Therefore, you should always lean towards the Google Approach of “launch and iterate,” as that is more in line with the product you purchased.

Also, advocating for the “measure twice, cut once” approach tends to obscure the real issue. When customers advocate for this approach with a Subscription software purchase, this indicates two issues: 1) The last time they implemented Software – Agile wasn’t a thing, or 2) Fear. The use of Apple to support this method is deceiving. The difference here is that deadlines for Apple are real. If they weren’t, Apple would not exist. There is pressure for Apple to complete. In contrast, customers that “require” the Apple method usually do not have an absolute deadline. With no deadline, “measure twice, cut once” is an active decision to give into the fear and let that take the lead.

As the model for software delivery has changed over time – so too has the best way of implementing it. So embrace an Iterative approach and Overcome your fear – it’s what SAAS was built for.

Supporting Music

Wolf by Darkstar

Do Yeah by Bananagun

Originally published February 4, 2018

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related


Guiding Principles, Implementation Best Practices

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
The Hidden Requirements
NEXT
The Dark Side of Ambition

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

  • Book Reviews
  • Career Growth
  • Change Management
  • Conflict Resolution
  • Digital Transformation
  • Guiding Principles
  • Humor
  • Implementation Best Practices
  • Implementation Parables
  • Implementation Vocabulary
  • Leadership
  • Personal Growth
  • User Adoption
  • User Personas
  • Work Management
  • Work/Life Balance

Previous Posts

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • September 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
© 2023   All Rights Reserved.